Tag Archives: #Backpacking

Body and Brains – self-test

Posted on by

The main idea behind this post is to offer a self-test with regard to one’s level of body and brains, i.e. how smart and knowledgeable one is, and the physical level one has reached. To reiterate myself, it is thus not a question of either/or but to constitute a more or less complete personal synthesis.

Needless to say, this test and all of its ten questions hinge on a construct and is partly based on arbitrary or personal preferences, but its various components – which are reflected in the different questions and their respective answer alternatives – are based on both science and sound reflections. Many of these topics or sub-topics have also been elaborated in earlier blog posts, such as this one (about the importance of traveling for personal development) and this one (about general strength and endurance statistics). Notice that all strength statistics are based on strict and full-range movements.

The most difficult part has been to distinguish between different academic fields and subjects in relationship to a relevant international university ranking. The main point, though, is to take into account the current inflation of university ceritifications, degrees and diplomas and to be self-critical in this respect. And it is implied that one can largely or at least partly compensate the lack of a high-value degree with extensive reading of books.

 

1. How much can you squat?
Less than 1 x one’s particular body weight: 0p
1-sligthly less than 1,5 x one’s particular body weight: 1p
1,5-slightly less than 2x one’s particular body weight: 2p
2 or more than x one’s body weight: 3p

2. How much can you bench press?
Less than 1 x one’s particular body weight: 0p
1-slightly less than 1,25 x one’s particular body weight: 1p
1,25-slightly less than 1,5 x one’s particular body weight: 2p
1,5 or more x than one’s body weight: 3p

3. How much can you dead lift?
Male:
Less than 1,5 x one’s particular body weight: 0p
1,5-slightly less than 2 x one’s particular body weight: 1p
2-slightly less than 2,5 x one’s particular body weight: 2p
2,5 or more x than one’s body weight: 3p

Female:
Less than 1,25 x one’s particular body weight: 0p
1,25-slightly below 1,5 x one’s particular body weight: 1p
1,5-slightly below 2 x one’s particular body weight: 2p
2 or more x than one’s body weight: 3p

4. How many strict, wide-gripped chin-ups can you do?
Male:
0-9: 0p
10-14: 1p
15-19: 2p
20 or more: 3p

Female:
0-5: 0p
6-9: 1p
10-14: 2p
15 or more: 3p

5. How fast do you run three (3) kilometers on a regular all-weather running track?
Male:
15 minutes or more: 0p
14:59-13:00: 1p
12:59:-12:00: 2p
11:59 or less: 3p

Female:
16 minutes or more: 0p
15:59-14:00: 1p
13:59:-13:00: 2p
12:59 or less: 3p

6. What is your current level of educational achievement?
Upper-secondary school, diploma/certificate outside of a university context, various university courses and/or unfinished educational programs (regardless of university ranking), or a bachelor’s or master’s degree in the social sciences at a university out of the top 100 world ranking: 0p

Bachelor’s or master’s degree in the social sciences or humanities at a top 51-100 ranked university, bachelor’s or master’s degree in science, law, psychology or medicine from a 101-200 ranked university, phD in the social sciences or humanities from a 100-200 ranked university, or two Bachelor’s degrees or master’s degrees in the social sciences or humanities from a 50-100 ranked university: 1p

Bachelor’s or master’s degree in the social sciences or humanities from a top 50-11 ranked university, bachelor’s or master’s degree in science, law, psyhchology or medicine from a 100-51 ranked university, or a PhD from a 11-50 ranked university: 2p

Bachelor’s or master’s degree in social sciences or humanities from a top a top-ten ranked university, bachelor’s or master’s degree in science, law (법학 in Korean), psychology or medicine frm 11-50 ranked university, PhD, regardless of subject, from a 11-50 ranked university, hired docent, senior lecturer or professor at a 11-50 ranked university: 3p

7. How many novels and/or academic works have you read in their respective entirety during the last twelve (12) months?
0-9: 0p
10-19: 1p
20-49: 2p
50 or more: 3p

8. How many novels and/or academic works have you read in their respective entirety during your entire life?
0-99: 0p
100-200: 1p
200-499: 2p
500 or more: 3p

9. How many countries have you ever visited?
0-9: 0p
10-20: 1p
21-50: 2p
50 or more: 3p

10. How much time have you, in total, stayed abroad?
Less than six months: 0p
Six months up to slightly less than a year: 1p
One-two years: 2p
More than two years: 3p

 

0-10 points
You will probably need to work hard on your physical and intellectual development. If it seems impossible to earn a decent university degree – perhaps due to one’s particular personal situation – then focus on to visit both the gym and the library often and on a regular basis. Of course, changes in nutritional habits, and consequently loss of fat-weight, may also be important when it comes to physical development. Be active and patient at the same time.

It might also be the case that you are quite young and at some point within a larger personal process. If so, do not give up and continue in the right direction.

11-20 points
On the physical and intellectual continuum, you are somewhere in between and may have to decide if you want to keep improve (or perhaps work hard on maintenance) or continue to be – let us be honest – quite mediocre. If you are at the upper level, you have done a decent job already and are hopefully heading in the right direction.

21-25 points
You are indeed a physically able intellectual, or perhaps rather a quite intellectual fitness person, and can be proud of your progress so far. It might be the case that you do not have to develop even further, but perhaps a little more progress in one or even both of these respects is what you need in order to be or to feel more complete as a person.

26-30 points
You are one of those few individuals who have experienced large part of the world and for more extensive periods of time, earned a higher and prestigious degree at a top-ranked university, and in parallel with this do also have a high-class physique, both strength- and endurance-wise. Regardless of how your more exact socio-economic and personal situation is at the moment – there are, of course, other important things in life besides body and brains – you can be very proud of your achievements and development.

Huvudpoängen med detta inlägg är att erbjuda ett självtest som mäter ens grad av fysisk och intellektuell förmåga, vilket som bekant är en del av denna bloggs koncept och min egen livsfilosofi.

Det är givetvis svårt att konstruera “objektiva” tester som täcker in mycket av det som är väsentligt och samtidigt får med nyanser och gradskillnader, men jag har gjort mitt bästa, och mycket av detta bygger vidare på det jag har skrivit tidigare om till exempel vikten av att resa mycket och läsa mer utmanande litteratur för att utvecklas, samt att utgå från rimliga fysiska krav som (delvis) är anpassade efter vikt och kön.

Det svåraste har varit att göra rimliga avvägningar när det gäller universitetsutbildningsnivå, men poängen är att ta hänsyn till den inflation av utbildningar och examina som förekommer och att vara självkritisk i det avseendet. Som kompensation för en eventuell låg poäng i det avseendet kan man ha läst väldigt mycket litteratur, både inom ramarna för universitetsstudier och/eller på egen hand.

 

1. Hur mycket lyfter du i knäböj?
Kille/man:
Mindre än 1 x den egna kroppsvikten: 0p
1-1,5 x den egna kroppsvikten: 1p
1,5-strax under 2x den egna kroppsvikten: 2p
2 eller mer x än den egna kroppsvikten: 3P

Tjej/kvinna:
Mindre än 0,75 x den egna kroppsvikten: 0p
0,75-strax under 1 x den egna kroppsvikten: 1p
1-strax under 1,25 x den egna kroppsvikten: 2p
1,25 eller mer än x den egna kroppsvikten: 3p

2. Hur mycket lyfter du i bänkpress?
Kille/man:
Mindre än 1 x den egna kroppsvikten: 0p
1-strax under 1,25 x den egna kroppsvikten: 1p
1,25-strax under 1,5 x den egna kroppsvikten: 2p
1,5 eller mer x den egna kroppsvikten: 3p

Tjej/kvinna:
Mindre än 0,75 x den egna kroppsvikten: 0p
0,75-strax under 1 x den egna kroppsvikten: 1p
1-1,25 x den egna kroppsvikten: 2p
1,25 eller mer x den egna kroppsvikten: 3p

3. Hur mycket lyfter du i marklyft?
Kille/man:
Mindre än 1,5 x den egna kroppsvikten: 0p
1,5-strax under 1,75 x den egna kroppsvikten: 1p
1,5-strax under 2 x den egna kroppsvikten: 2p
2 eller mer x den egna kroppsvikten: 3p

Tjej/kvinna:
Mindre än 1 x den egna kroppsvikten: 0p
1-strax under 1,25 x den egna kroppsvikten: 1p
1,25-strax under 1,5 x den egna kroppsvikten: 2p
1,5 eller mer x den egna kroppsvikten: 3p

4. Hur många strikta chin-ups med brett grepp kan du göra?
Kille/man:
0-9: 0p
10-14: 1p
15-19: 2p
20 eller fler: 3p

Tjej/kvinna:
0-5: 0p
6-19: 1p
10-14: 2p
15 eller fler: 3p

5. Hur snabbt springer du tre (3) kilometer på en vanlig löparbana?
Kille/man:
15 minuter eller mer: 0p
14:59-13:00: 1p
12:59:-12:00: 2p
11:59 eller mindre: 3p

Tjej/kvinna:
16 minuter eller mer: 0p
15:59-14:00: 1p
13:59:-13:00: 2p
12:59 eller mindre: 3p

6. Vilken är din nuvarande akademiska utbildningsnivå?
Gymnasieutbildning, diplom/certifikat utanför ett universitetssammanhang, högskole- eller universitetsstudier i samband med diverse oavslutade utbildningar eller kurser (oavsett universitetsranking), kandidatexamen eller masterexamen i samhällsvetenskapliga ämnen eller humaniora vid ett topp 101-200-universitet på internationell rankinglista: 0p

Kandidat- eller masterexamen i samhällsvetenskapliga ämnen eller humaniora vid ett 51–100-rankat universitet, kandidat- eller masterexamen i naturvetenskapligt ämne, juridik, psykologi, eller medicin vid ett 101-200-rankat universitet, PhD i samhällsvetenskapligt ämne eller humaniora vid ett 101-200-rankat universitet: 1p

Kandidat- eller masterexamen i samhällsvetenskapliga ämnen eller humaniora vid ett 100-51-rankat universitet, kandidat- eller masterexamen i naturvetenskapligt ämne, juridik, psykologi, eller medicin vid ett 51-100-rankat lärosäte, PhD i samhällsvetenskapligt ämne eller humaniora vid ett 51-100-rankat universitet, PhD i naturvetenskapligt ämne, juridik eller psykologi vid ett 101-200-rankat universitet: 2p

Kandidat- eller masterexamen i samhällsvetenskapliga ämnen eller humaniora vid ett topp-tio-rankat universitet, kandidat- eller masterexamen i naturvetenskapligt ämne, juridik, psykologi, eller medicin vid ett 11-50-rankat universitet, PhD i något ämne vid ett 11-50-rankat universitet, anställd docent eller professor vid 51-100-rankat universitet: 3p

7. Hur många hela romaner och/eller akademiska verk har du läst under de senaste tolv (12) månaderna?
0-9: 0p
10-19: 1p
20-49: 2p
50 eller fler: 3p

8. Hur många hela romaner och/eller akademiska verk har du läst under hela din livstid?
0-99: 0p
100-200: 1p
200-499: 2p
500 eller fler: 3p

9. Hur många länder har du vistats i?
0-9: 0p
10-20: 1p
21-50: 2p
50 eller fler: 3p

10. Hur mycket tid har du sammantaget tillbringat utomlands?
Mindre än sex månader: 0p
Sex månader till och med strax under ett år: 1p
Ett-två år: 2p
Mer än två år: 3p

 

0-10 poäng
Du måste förmodligen arbeta hårt för att utvecklas fysiskt och intellektuellt, i synnerhet om du är lite äldre – för ungas del kan det handla om att man bara har kommit en viss bit i en längre personlig utvecklingsprocess och bör fortsatta på den inslagna vägen. Om det av olika skäl verkar omöjligt att genomföra en gedigen universitetsutbildning, kan det vara lämpligt med många och regelbundna biblioteks- och gymbesök (och man kan även genomföra kurser som ger en, om än inte en helgjuten utbildning, högre grad av bildning och kunskap), och/eller bevista motionsspåret. Självklart kan det även vara väsentligt för många att förändra sina kostvanor och följaktligen minska sin underhudsfettvikt, vilket i sin tur tenderar att göra en både snabbare och starkare i förhållande till kroppsvikt. Det kan också vara relevant att utvärdera sin privatekonomi och spara pengar som läggs på skräpmat och shopping till en resa resa.

11-20 poäng
På det fysiska och intellektuella kontinuumet, är du någonstans mittemellan och måste kanske avgöra om du vill fortsätta att utvecklas eller – låt oss vara ärliga – vara relativt medioker. Eller så måste du kanske kämpa för att bibehålla din nuvarande nivå, vilket kan vara nog så viktigt.

21-25 poäng
Du är utan tvekan en mycket fysiskt utvecklat intellektuell, eller kanske snarare en intellektuell fitnessperson. Det kan kanske vara så att du inte behöver utvecklas särskilt mycket mer, eller så är det precis det där lilla extra som behövs för att bli eller uppleva själv dig vara mer komplett som person, fysiskt och/eller intellektuellt.

26-30 poäng
Du är en av ganska få personer, andelsmässigt, som har upplevt stora delar av världen, och under längre perioder dessutom, erhåller en prestigefylld examen vid ett mer eller mindre topp-rankat universitet, och parallellt med detta har en högklassig fysik, såväl styrke- som uthållighetsmässigt. Oavsett hur din livssituation i ekonomiskt och andra avseenden ter sig i nuläget – det finns givetvis andra viktiga saker i livet än fysisk och intellektuell utveckling – kan du vara stolt över vad du har åstadkommit hittills.

The Apollonian and Dionysian

Posted on by

One way to describe a lifestyle, or even life-stance, is to use relevant philosophical or cultural-historical concepts that highlight how one as a person does live, or wants to live; it can be both descriptive and prescriptive. In my case – and perhaps in many other people’s lives too – the Apollonian and the Dionysian can have bearing in this respect.

Historically, these concepts are linked to classic Greek thinkers and what some of those have said about the two gods Apollo (아폴론 in Korean) and Dionysus (디오니소스 in Korean), which represent different aspects of the human existence. However, these terms are even more well-known because of certain European philisophers and philologists such as Friedrich Nietzsche and particularly his work The Birth of tragedy (1872). Nietzsche has been criticized by several scholars for misrepresenting the religio-historical elements of these two gods, but the point is that he used them and had an idea about how they could symbolize something regarding culture and the modern way of life (which he mostly loathed). Here is a quote from his above-mentioned work:

And psychologically speaking, what then is the meaning of that madness out of which tragic as well as comic art grew, the Dionysian madness? What? Is madness perhaps not necessarily the symptom of degradation, of collapse, of cultural decadence? Are there perhaps — a question for doctors who treat madness — neuroses associated with health? With the youth of a people and with youthfulness? What is revealed in that synthesis of god and goat in the satyr? Out of what personal experience, what impulse, did the Greek have to imagine the Dionysian enthusiast and original man as a satyr? And so far as the origin of the tragic chorus is concerned, in those centuries when the Greek body flourished and the Greek soul bubbled over with life, were there perhaps endemic raptures? Visions and hallucinations which entire communities, entire cultural bodies, shared? How’s that? What if it were the case that the Greeks, right in the richness of their youth, had the will for the tragic and were pessimists? What if it was clearly lunacy, to use a saying from Plato, which brought the greatest blessings throughout Greece?

This is a complex topic in itself and I will not even try to analyze its many angles, and explain neither Nietzsche’s interpretations, nor examine some of those who have written about his philosophical (and philological) contribution in this regard. Instead I will try to, as briefly as possible, point out some of the main characteristics of the Apollonian and Dionysian, and then relate these two concepts to more current socio-cultural conditions and my own way of living.

The Apollonian represents human reason, ethics, and a ordered way of life, while the Dionysian on the other hand is almost the opposite – the chaotic, perhaps tragic, and intoxicating. Both are related to culture, such as music, but concern different aspects of them. Below one can see an example of how these two can be categorized.

When it comes to intellectual and physical modes and activities, and the integration of the body and brains concept, it is not difficult to distinguish some characteristics which are related to both the Appolonian and the Dionysian, however only partial. Mostly, though, they are linked to the former, since one has to be rational, structured and logical in order to read and understood literature, and to complete both studies and workout and diet plans.

As I have said in an earlier post, one almost crucial way to develop intellectually is to travel quite extensively, since it broadens one’s horizons of understanding life and the world, and to party and eat junk food is of course the opposite of physical development.

However, if it is being done selectively and, mostly in conjunction with traveling and thus at new and more exciting locations than one’s home town or city, then party (and other more adventerous activities) adds a relevant and Dionysian dimension which makes existence more complete.

For the sake of simplicity, think perhaps of the funny film trilogy The Hangover (I have only seen part I and part II, but visited Tijuana, where the third film partly takes place, and hence know a little about what this hell-hole is like). As a person you do want to have the experience of some of those nights, although perhaps a little bit less twisted in some respects. One can be 20 or 30, or perhaps even a bit older, but regardless of that, the Dionysian element should not be wholly neglected but, instead, incorporated into a person’s life (and of course, there are always exceptions, some does not want to party and be adventurous at all).

The Apollonian constitutes the basis, whereas the Dionysian does occasionally complement the former.

Daintree
Me and some friends having a good time in Daintree rainforest, Queensland, Australia (2009) – one of the 35 countries that I have visited so far (저 하고 친구 같이 호주퀸즐랜드 에서마시고 시간을 참 잘 보냈어요.)

Ett sätt att förstå ens eget liv och tillvaro är genom begreppen apollinisk och dionysisk, som är knutna till de grekiska gudarna Apollo och Dionysos, och använts av ett flertal europeiska filosofer, framför allt Friedrich Nietzsche i hans verk Tragedins födelse.

Det hela är ganska komplext, men kan förenklas genom att säga att det apolliniska representerar det ordnade, rationella och logiska i tillvaron, medan det dionysiska är motsatsen, det kaotiska och oordnade. Tänk på Baksmällan-filmerna eller någon av de egna galna utekvällarna, kanske inte minst utomlands.

Relaterar man detta till mitt och den här bloggens koncept, är det enkelt att inse att det apolliniska är grunden i tillvaron, men att det dionysiska kan fungera som ett komplement, som visar sig med vissa mellanrum. Det sista kan också kopplas till resor, och att utforska världen och livets mer extatiska och kaotiska dimensioner. (Sedan är det förstås valfritt om man vill festa eller inte.)